You're right, this isn't a flame war until I start acting like a dick. I can't make a counter point if your point makes absolutely no sense. Clarify, then we'll debate.
Please, only call me an artist or a critic if I self identify as one.
Hello, I believe you said that Ms. AQ Mc Arson's (c) work was sub par in some shape or form. Claiming that because she added ears to something that was meant to be a joke in the first place that this devalued one of her pieces of art in some way, then when corrected decided to retreat into the comeback of telling her that her work was bad as a whole.
I am hear to tell you that you sir are a merchant of bullshit, that is not a flame, that is a fact. Ms. AQ Mc Arson (c) is an extremely talented artist and you do not have the right to dictate what she can and cannot draw, that is not being critical that is being an asshole.
Speaking of critical, you're also hypocritical, you dare put down Ms. Aq Mc Arson's (c)work while your own work shows no great effort or technical prowess.
Good day sir, I hope you learn to grow up in your opinions and your attitudes.
Well, M(r)(s). Niall I am wholeheartedly sorry for having an opinion. Please, go ahead and reprimand me for having the following opinions as well:
I don't believe in Gods.
I don't belive in ghosts, ghoulies or spirits.
I don't believe in mainstream rap.
I don't believe in furries.
The list goes on.
You feel my flash work (I kind of just picked up flash) is sub par, and that's fine. It's your opinion and I respect that. I might even try harder with my flash work, even though it may have been an opinion fueled by your anger.
To me Ms. Aq Mc Arson didn't do a good job because I thought the ears were cat ears. In my OPINION if she did a better drawing the person I would've been able to tell what kind of animal happens to be spliced into that person.
I'm not hypocritical. If I was being hypocritical I would've said "Hai, gurl, you're art SUCKS. Mine drawin' is better" and show her one of my own drawings (which, to be honest, suck).
Good day sir/ma'am, I hope you learn to treat other people's opinions as you wish to have yours treated.
Good day Mr. Bates. If you took the time to look at any of AQ Mc Arson's (c) Gallery or the picture in question you'd find that her artistic talent is far superior to what you believe, your opinion as it may be is an invalid one because it lacks reasoning.
The fact that you cannot tell the difference between the ears of a canine or the ears of a feline are purely down to your inexperiance or ignorance. I do believe you will find yourself hypocritical unless you continue your ignorance to the fact that you cannot create art that is on a par to subjectively put other peoples work down for stupid, invalid reasons.
Good day ignorant sheezy "artist", I hope you learn to see yourself the way you portray yourself.
I did, and she is a pretty nifty artist. But in my (I'll put emphasis on it) OPINION that picture sucked. Hard. Opinions don't need reasoning. I like ska music, does it matter why? I do because I do. I disliked that picture simply because I didn't like it.
Ignorance of what? I have a dog and a kitten (and she's a cutie pie, yes she is, yes she is) so we can rule inexperience out.
"I do believe you will find yourself hypocritical unless you continue your ignorance to the fact that you cannot create art that is on par to subjectively put other peoples work down for stupid, invalid reasons."
You need to clear this sentence up for me. So I'm a hypocrite unless I'm ignorant to the fact that I can't make art that is on a par? Par to what? Par to my 10 year old nephew, par to a well known artist? What were my reasons for putting down other peoples work?
On the topic of my ignorance: I know I suck at art, I even admitted it in my last reply. Go read it over again, it's pretty easy to spot.
Wow, you're completely missing the point here, by a mile. Go review my previous statement. I won't bother to repeat what I have just clearly explained.
Far from it. Hows about this: Explain yourself in point form, then I will go about debunking it in point form. We'll lather, rinse and repeat until one of us dies.
You fail to realise that the point of any ethical debate is not until one 'dies', that's a mere flame war. It's to make a point then bow out. I've made my point, read it, absorb. For you've failed to counter debate.
You're right, this isn't a flame war until I start acting like a dick. I can't make a counter point if your point makes absolutely no sense. Clarify, then we'll debate.
Please, only call me an artist or a critic if I self identify as one.
Submit Artwork 
Manage Artwork 
Manage Journal 
Messages 
Watch List 
Settings 
Logout 
Upgrade 
Artwork
Favorites
Profile
Comments
